Angels & Evolution
Click To Read This
The supernatural origins of humanity is deduced from the frontiers of quantum physics, angels, with "cosmic shortcuts", and Near Death out of body Experiences NDEs (see video Daniel Ekechukwu - below, and video Ian McCormack Glimpse of Eternity - below); along with the rationale for "cosmic shortcuts". Because belief in the frontiers of quantum physics, inter-dimensional near death experiences, our body/soul/spirit, and angels set a precedent for belief that the multi-dimensional Cosmos was also created beyond our natural / materialism's laws. In response to Richard Dawkin's statement: "DNA neither cares nor knows. DNA just is." River Out Of Eden. p. 133 : There's questions such as : Where did all the information come from for DNA/RNA, what is energy and Life, how does quantum physics apply to DNA, what constitutes intellect / mind / personality - as is purported to also be required of angels, and that of our own body / soul / spirit,
why don't identical twins have identical personalities - is it due to copy-number-variations even from their earliest age and for every pair of twins on Earth, what are instincts intuition and inspiration, what is imagination and choice, how do DNA and quantum physics give rise to thoughts and what is concentration, what is language and why does it differ so widely, how do angels employ these things, how does the brain work and how does quantum physics apply to the brain, quite a lot of profound mysteries that evolution glosses over.
Quantum Biology: Irreducible Mind (Part 4)
It's deduced that we were created supernaturally not by naturalism's random materialistic processes. If you explain angels as having their origins through supernatural laws, ("without having any regard for physics, reality, etc."), no longer is "naturalism" the only laws at work in the universe. A precedent is set which can apply for the origins of humanity, our body, soul & spirit too. Spiritual people, and those who assume the existence of angels, cannot have it both ways with a false dichotomy that argues for a purely naturalistic origins of humanity - theistic evolution - while accepting we have a spirit, mind, intelligence, personality - which originated like that of angels. No longer is "naturalism" the only laws at work in the universe, to explain our body, soul, and spirit requires supernatural origins for humanity. If angels and supernatural laws or occasional scientifically impossible feats ?are in fact reality? then much that we know about the universe needs reviewing. See more analysis of this below - contrasting the natural and supernatural.
Have you considered below unexplained supernatural events ?
Aliens, UFOs - Are We Alone In The Universe ?
Click To Read This
A review of Cosmology and origins unlike many others.
Can angels or aliens travel up to or
faster than light speed ? Are wormholes, subspace, hyperspace, slipstreams, corridors or conduits,
warp speeds, trans-warp, folding of space, bridges, portals and gateways, or
inter-dimensional travel real ?
If any of them are real, what would that tell us about the age of the universe ?
If alien / UFO advocates believe it is possible for angels or aliens to span the heavens (the universe) within very short time frames then the universe has a mechanism useful for rapid interstellar travel (which mechanism would have existed before any creatures did, for the universe's own existence & creation) and dating the universe by implication that billions of light years is the yardstick need not be correct. The universe need not necessarily be old in such a scenario, since it can be spanned quickly, using cosmic shortcuts.
It's one thing to travel at light speed, it's another thing to slow down again once the destination is reached. Additionally, a return trip would require the same energy needs.
More detailed review of UFOs/UAPs
Space is more than just a vacuum, having dust of different sizes, meteorites, cosmic rays, and gases. Traveling rapidly through those particles (whether through either space or an atmosphere-with it's considerable friction) would/have destroy any material ship, terrestrial or extraterrestrial (actually extradimensional). Also, travel must deal with extreme g-forces when performing rapid maneuvers. Material creatures and craft have quite limited capacity for that. Since it's a matter of record that reported craft ,
Fox About Sightings,
mashable.com Review,
NASA May 2023
routinely perform high G maneuvers (through myriad particles, with friction when reaching an atmosphere) those feats require us to consider whether alleged aliens are not material creatures & craft, and are therefore probably extradimensional.
Wonder why alleged interstellar craft or orbs often appear relatively small - around the size of a football field for one case, (or segmented), when they have to house an alleged warp drive to travel extraordinary distances within creature time frames; a means of abating extreme g-forces; a particle & friction "shield"; and ought to require a large number of crew (who ought to require food&drink[heavy in bulk storage]&heavy long duration or light year/s energy[nuclear thermo-electric generator? for high power requirements]&waste disposal&atmosphere throughout travel to us and back again; &significant weight with associated substantial inertia limiting high speed maneuvers - for craft, cargo, and occupants allegedly composed of matter.
Along with -localised- internal artificial gravity and simultaneous nonlocalised external antigravity [which would likely overwhelm alleged internal artificial gravity - being incompatible requirements] {unless there were deceptive occult forces at work, masquerading as aliens}) to handle lifesupport duties and social activities over interstellar and terrestrial travel. Science fiction (or arts) seem to dream about large craft, perhaps for those reasons.
Can material craft, it's power supply, cargo, atmosphere, and occupants be made invisible ? If matter is made of quantum energy, would it take the equivalent of the large hadron collider or a nuclear explosion to transform bulk matter into bulk energy, and then could we reverse that process ? Could we reconstitute it all at will at a later time - while preserving that bulk matter or energy, atmosphere, internal artificial gravity with external antigravity along with inertia or g-force management, in a viable or living state at all times ?
Biblically it's mentioned that nonmaterial angels and chariots exist, that can be either humanly invisible or visible. And near death experiences are stated to include invisible soul/people viewing the visible world, with the out-of-body person being reality. We notice that a OoB person isn't transforming matter into quantum energy as the soul slightly preexists our body, & DNA is made of quantum energy that is shaped by our soul/s -- ie biblically mentioned "kinds" (those kinds elude definition by "material" sciences -- partly because of not recognizing that DNA is made of quantum energy). But angels and chariot spiritual bodies, that at some point become visible to humans, start out as transforming spiritual/soul into material/visible. In contrast to alleged UFOs which are assumed to be material that then are made nonmaterial/invisible without an explosion to convert material into nonmaterial.
Humanity will be able to know if there's an allegedly cloaked (invisible quantum energy, with associated multifrequency energy signature for complex matter) ship/power supply/atmosphere/cargo+bulk food&drink/occupants made of matter/energy, (and not inter-dimensional, ie are conventional matter/energy, and light), by using a combined radar with scanning laser, and telescope spectroscopy plus radio frequency spectrum analyzer to see what wavelengths the complex energy are composed of. Pointed at a location where either radar and sightings or a few of it's "aliens" suggest it is, similar to the laser used to detect the distance of our moon. Since it's occupants are beings alleged, by science fiction and abductees claims, to start out as matter/energy and "light" humanity can detect their complex energy signatures, even when made into invisible bulk energy. (Angels are said to start out nonmaterial/spiritual so we wouldn't expect to be able to detect them.) If that doesn't occur for alleged aliens then their cloak will show them and their ship & material bulk food+drink, power generator, cargo, atmosphere, etc to be interdimensional, rather than material alleged aliens. Trips on their ship will be necessary to validate their claims of being material/energy and "light".
Detailed below, travelling rapidly through another dimension (a dimension like for NDEs) would mean our lightspeed isn't the yardstick for the size and age of the Cosmos. A higher speed dimension/s would exist for the universe's creation and existence, before any creatures existed. That means the Cosmos would be younger and not be the eons old age hypothesized by evolution. So no eons old aliens/worlds/craft would exist.
Besides another high speed dimension, we also have good evidence that the time required for light to travel reduces [ie atomic processes of the clocks used to measure time speed up], the further we are from any mass - which masses cause light and atomic processes to slow down, due to the time dilation of gravity wells.
And, we don't know how substantially faster atomic processes were before substantial time dilation could occur, at the beginning of time when planets and stars were either tiny or only water ("the deep") and gases (hydrogen or helium?).
Size in billions of light-years or parsecs isn't necessarily synonymous with inter-dimensional age, hinted at by quantum entanglement. We can be confident from physical parallax measurements using simple trigonometry, by the Hubble Space Telescope, that at least a "size"/distance up to a maximum of about
1000 parsecs or 3,260 light years
(for parallax measurements) does indicate large distance measurements for stars in our galaxy, the milky way. Those who struggle with parallax reality might read about it in the linked wikipedia article. It is said that the Milky Way has a diameter of about 100,000 light years. But such "size"/
distance isn't necessarily synonymous with great age, since inter-dimensional travel is thought to not be constrained by parameters of a physical (quantum) universe and light speed.
If video reports of UAP/s allegedly having rapid lightyears travel (or even humanly impossible atmospheric travel) is correct, then craft may span part of our Cosmos (or atmosphere) through a higher speed dimension -- ie cosmic shortcut/s. (Associated with inter-dimensional near death/afterlife experiences too.)
Extra dimensions would exist for creation or existence of the universe/Cosmos, before any creatures existed; hinted at by quantum entangled particles. (Because belief in the frontiers of quantum physics, inter-dimensional near death experiences, our body/soul/spirit, and angels [and reported extradimensional terrestrial/extraterrestrial craft] set a precedent for belief that the multi-dimensional Cosmos was also created beyond our natural/quantum/ materialism's laws).
I'm reminded that DNA is constituted of quantum energy too; though they're not all equal, as observed for biblically defined kinds, based in their spiritual soul manifested physically (eg the soul independent of DNA as for 2 credible inter-dimensional NDE afterlife experiences, and angels).
If we project the physical constraint of light speed onto a spiritual reality (check) then we're conflating two different worldviews. We draw conclusions about inter-dimensional beings
that visit our physical universe, and how that sets a higher speed limit for the Cosmos - so it's age isn't necessarily old (a counter-intuitive Copernican insight?), but evidently have
to be cautious, due to lack of detailed observations, for a reversed inference about humans
visiting another dimension, primarily for any relationship of our light speed to that
dimension's distances or age. Except that biblically the angels heaven would be closely correlated with the age of our Cosmos (as proven authoritative by heptadic structure, and
the accepted wisdom that a few heavenly dimensions were created along with the angels).
If humanity meets again an inter-dimensional being/alien/craft? (or recognizes inter-dimensional NDE's)
then we'll all know once again that our Cosmos isn't necessarily old, due to cosmic shortcuts -
through higher speed dimension/s that exist for creation or existence of the multi-dimensional
universe/Cosmos.
Tech Life 4/1/24 :
Gate of the garden of Eden ?
Perhaps reporter/s could go to the Gulf of Aqaba to see what might emerge about this alleged discovery ?
There's no photos, just talk so far. It might just be an old reconstruction, and not the original, as TGoE was supposedly by the Euphrates + Tigris rivers (wherever they originally were) ?
Expedition Bible 30/1/24 : Searching for The Garden of Eden's Pishon River (found)
Garden of Eden - more on it's history & location
Does Distant Starlight Prove the Universe Is Old? by Dr Jason Lisle
Critics of creation sometimes use distant starlight as an argument
against a young universe. But when we examine this argument carefully, we will see that it does not work.
- The Assumptions of Light Travel-time Arguments
- The Assumption of Rigidity of Time
- Assumptions of
Synchronization
- The Assumption of Naturalism
- Light Travel-Time: A Self-Refuting Argument
I'm waiting for phDs to resolve the key truth about the changes in rigidity of time throughout the Cosmos, due to changes in gravity (and the warping of space-time by differing masses, according to General Relativity theory).
One interesting foray into the matter is e/book, by theoretical physicist Unzicker,
Einstein's Lost Key which discusses Relativity and a possible variable speed of light, that Einstein and other physicists also considered. Unzicker appears to describe a steady-state universe, about which we're tempted to conclude there wasn't need of a beginning. However, when considered along with the Cosmic Microwave Background CMB, we still have a remnant fairly uniformly distributed evidence of the big flash as Unzicker calls it.
People get Relativity confused because there's 2 formulations:
- Special Relatvity - 1905 Easy time dilation due to velocity, length change, and Lorentz stuff because you're moving at some speed
Einstein showed us that people experience time at different rates depending on the physical situation that person happens to be in. It came about because of a bizarre quirk in the speed of light.
- General Relativity - 1915 More difficult. Time dilation due to gravity
similar results but due to gravitational effects.
cf
General Relativity: Top 05 Mishaps [inc INTERSTELLAR]
cf
Gravitational Time Dilation - wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Viking_1
Shapiro time delay - wikipedia
Gravity Probe A - wikipedia
Tests of general relativity - wikipedia
How did we measure the fastest speed there is? | The History of the Speed of Light Part I
Why can't anything go faster than the speed of light? | The History of the Speed of Light Part II
http://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Maxwell %27s_equations - is the speed of light (i.e. phase velocity) in a medium with permeability mu0, and permittivity epsilon0. In a vacuum, vp = c0 = 299,792,458 meters per second, a fundamental physical constant.
Electromagnetic wave equation - is the speed of light (i.e. phase velocity) in a medium with permeability mu0, and permittivity epsilon0. In a vacuum, vph = c0 = 299,792,458 meters per second, a fundamental physical constant
Permeability of free space, measured in a vacuum
mu0 = 1.25663706212(19)x10-6 H/m
Permittivity of free space
epsilon0 = 8.854,187,8176x10-12
so
ie the speed of light
http://en.wikipedia.org /wiki/ Vacuum_permeability
http://en.wikipedia.org / wiki/Permittivity
It seems mu and epsilon, in a vacuum, needn't thus far be correct in free interstellar and intergalactic space. Being measured SI units, it hasn't been possible to measure them outside of our solar system or Milky Way galaxy. Nevertheless, we can improve on those measurements by partially going beyond the immediate extent of the solar system.
[The furthest lightspeed measurement is stated to be that of James Bradley in 1728, "Gamma Draconis is at a distance of 154.3 lightyears (47.3 parsecs) from the Sun,[1] as determined by parallax measurements from the Hipparcos astrometry satellite" ie well within the stated 100,000 light year diameter of the Milky Way. That rough or broad lightspeed measurement is well outside our solar system, but going incrementally further from Earth will give us enough evidence to show that lightspeed outside the Milky Way must be considerably faster (because time itself ie the second is faster)].
Something of that is also mentioned in this video which comments on GPS measurements http://youtu.be /Z4oy6mnkyW4
Someone stated that Einstein's equations 1916 were built on the shoulders of Maxwell's equations 1873. But in Maxwell's and Einstein's times we weren't able to measure or theorize about anything outside our galaxy. ( http://en.wikipedia.org /wiki/ Speed_of_ light#Measurement )
Why is the speed of light what it is? Maxwell equations visualized.
( An aside - For the curious intellectual, here is a proposed revised concept of the ether, in relation to GPS satellites http://arxiv.org/ ftp/physics/papers/0502/ 0502007.pdf 5.8 Summary of etherdragging hypothesis )
The Truth Why We Can't Travel Faster Than Light thoughty2 3/9/20
He discusses time dilation, as accounted for by GPS, but only the form dealing with motion, not the form of time dilation resulting from a gravitational field or the warping of space-time by proximity to a mass according to Relativity theory. They both say that the speed of light is a constant, but that like with the mentioned wormhole - in agreement with Relativity - time itself speeds up the more distant from any mass, similar to what is thought to happen outside of the solar system and with intergalatic travel for massless photons.
It's reported that there is a 5 microsecond difference per year between the atomic clocks at Greenwich and at Boulder Colorado, apparently due to a change in gravity
http://creationwiki.org / Gravitational time dilation
It's therefore likely that outside of our solar system there is a significant difference in the seeming rigidity of time, and between galaxies that seeming rigidity of time is likely to be considerably different, in interstellar and intergalactic space.
Since atomic clocks run faster, to some uncertain extent, outside of a gravitational field, it's possible that the speed of light, at 300,000 kilometres per second, also has it's per second time altered. So a second runs faster in interstellar and intergalactic space than it does on Earth. This is hypothesized to explain why we see starlight, from vast distances away, within human time frames. And may indicate that distance measurements in light years is an imprecise description of vast distances. Measurements of upto 1000 parsecs will be interesting as they're determined by trigonometry. But such measurements are limited to within the Milky Way galaxy, so aren't applicable to intergalactic light-years. If these musings are substantiated then the Cosmos needn't be as old as the imprecise measure of light-years could suggest.
By reasoning about intergalactic and interstellar light speed, and how that makes distance / time measurements in light years questionable, we remove theorized eons upon which theorized evolution of the universe depends. As time dilation, reducing outside of large masses or gravity wells, becomes the emerging norm it will leave no room for evolution time frames, and therefore "finite controlled" ascension speculation will struggle to stay afloat too. Infinite controlled ascension speculation is authenticated by unique Bible heptadic structure, and repeatedly raising the dead on demand.
Similarly, the uniformity of the cosmic microwave background CMB could be accounted for by higher speed(faster seconds) radiation of microwaves. Without that higher speed the uniformity of CMB has the horizon problem, not currently adequately explained. http://en.wikipedia.org /wiki/ Horizon_problem
Also outlined here
Gravity's effect on the flow of time in General Relativity Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky
How Gravity Affects Time | Gravity and Me | Spark Jan 2019
Variable speed of light theories http://en.wikipedia.org /wiki/ Variable_speed_of_light
I may never fully understand theoretical physics/astrophysics and don't know what the answer is to http://en.wikipedia.org /wiki/ Variable_speed_of_light - about gravitational constant G and the Finestructure constant. Why can't you go faster than light? Fermilab 2017
http://youtu.be/ A2JCoIGyGxc
Quantum Gravity: How quantum mechanics ruins Einstein's general relativity Arvin Ash Oct 2020
http://youtu.be/ S3Wtat5QNUA
When theory conflicts with observation then observation prevails. We have solid observation for time dilation, viewed the further we are from any mass, so "varying in space or time" is a fact, though it isn't clear to what extent this occurs outside of our solar system or galaxy. GPS satellite adjustment for time dilation is quite interesting, and highly suggestive of significant time difference outside the solar system.
How does time dilation figure in to initially lower mass water/planets, when time was faster than when in close proximity to ?sooner or later? planets having greater mass ? I was raised in a subculture that was inclined towards 7 day creation, but we don't know what speed atomic processes were running at before substantial time dilation could occur, so what constituted a "day", **before light and darkness/night or creatures or the Sun existed**.
The Hebrew clearly holds to a seven day week and sabbath (Exodus 20:11), so we have work to do to reconcile that with the reduced time dilation, before light and darkness/night or creatures or the Sun existed.
When light was separated from darkness (or night) was that when 24 hour days began ? Before that, there was, biblically, only "the deep", which would have been water/planet/s, "hovering over the face of the waters."
I've done all I know how to thus far, and defer to phDs for building on other questions raised. My ADD prevents me remembering enough theory to master others physics questions, i'm out of my depth on theoretical physics.
It seems mu0 and epsilon0, in a vacuum, needn't thus far be correct in free interstellar and intergalactic space. Being measured SI units, it hasn't been possible to measure them outside of our solar system or Milky Way galaxy. We can improve on those measurements by partially going beyond the immediate extent of the solar system. Something of that is also mentioned in this video which comments on time dilation for GPS measurements
http://youtu.be/ Z4oy6mnkyW4
Some clarification is here
http://en.wikipedia.org /wiki/ Gravitational time dilation and
http://britannica.com /science/time-dilation
and Time Dilation - Einstein's Theory Of Relativity Explained!
http://youtu.be /yuD34tEpRFw
Someone stated that Einstein's equations 1916 were built on the shoulders of Maxwell's equations 1873. But in Maxwell's and Einstein's times we weren't able to measure or theorize about permeability0 or permittivity0 outside our Milky Way galaxy or perhaps our solar system. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/ Speed_of_ light#Measurement ) Why is the speed of light what it is?
Maxwell equations visualized.
It's clear that the speed of light has only been measured within our Milky Way galaxy, so we can't be scientifically certain what it's speed is in the weak gravitational field of intergalactic space (and there may be some variation within interstellar space too). The furthest measurement is stated to be that of James Bradley in 1728, "Gamma Draconis is at a distance of 154.3 lightyears (47.3 parsecs) from the Sun,[1] as determined by parallax measurements from the Hipparcos astrometry satellite", ie well within the stated 100,000 light year diameter of the Milky Way.
http://en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Gamma_Draconis
http://en.wikipedia.org /wiki/James_Bradley
Measurements of upto 1000 parsecs will be valid as they're determined by trigonometry. But such measurements are limited to within the Milky Way galaxy, so aren't applicable to intergalactic light-years/speed. Again similarly, "We can be confident from physical parallax measurements using simple trigonometry, by the Hubble Space Telescope, that at least a "size"/distance up to a maximum of about 1000 parsecs or 3,260 light years (for parallax measurements) can be used for Stellar Aberration measurements for stars in our galaxy, ie still within the Milky Way."
Also General Relativity predicts that time dilation occurs ("varying in space or time") the closer to any mass. GPS satellite adjustment for time dilation is quite interesting, and highly suggestive of significant time dilation, viewed from outside the solar system.
see http://youtu.be /Z4oy6mnkyW4
General Relativity: Top 05 Mishaps [inc INTERSTELLAR].
We know that GPS satellites are adjusted for time dilation, http://astronomy-ohio-state.edu /pogge.1/Ast162 /Unit5/gps.html, so any testing for that can improve on those adjustments the further we go from Earth orbit. Eventually a more ideal time dilation test will be done in interstellar space, but in the meantime we can improve on currently known results as we go incrementally further from Earth, out into the solar system away from the Sun and planets beyond the heliopause.
"... the satellites are in orbits high above the Earth, where the curvature of spacetime due to the Earth's mass is less than it is at the Earth's surface. A prediction of General Relativity is that clocks closer to a massive object will seem to tick more slowly than those located further away (see the Black Holes lecture). As such, when viewed from the surface of the Earth, the clocks on the satellites appear to be ticking faster than identical clocks on the ground. A calculation using General Relativity predicts that the clocks in each GPS satellite should get ahead of ground-based clocks by 45 microseconds per day. ...
The engineers who designed the GPS system included these relativistic effects when they designed and deployed the system. For example, to counteract the General Relativistic effect once in orbit, the onboard clocks were designed to "tick" at a slower frequency than ground reference clocks, so that once they were in their proper orbit stations their clocks would appear to tick at about the correct rate as compared to the reference atomic clocks at the GPS ground stations."
ie the speed of light
Again, when theory conflicts with observation then observation prevails.
http://physics.info /general-relativity/Time dilation is
Given above that time dilation t' includes c^2, which can be calculated from mu0 and epsilon0, we know that time dilation also depends on permeability and permittivity of free space. Time (dilated) will vary with respect to c, the further it is viewed from any mass. where...
t = duration of an event in the gravitational field of some object (a planet, a sun, a black hole)
t' = duration of the same event when viewed from infinitely far away (a hypothetical location where the gravitational field is zero)
m = mass of the gravitating object
r = distance from the gravitating object to where the event is occurring (their separation)
c = speed of light in a vacuum (a universal, and apparently unchanging constant)
G = universal gravitational constant (another universal, and apparently unchanging constant)
In Einstein's theory of relativity, space and time became a thing - a thing that could do stuff like expand, contract, shear, and warp (or bend or curve).
Speed of light#Measurement
Why can't you go faster than light? Fermilab 2017
http://youtu.be/A2JCoIGyGxc
We know for certain that time slows down in proximity to any mass, and in ( Albert Einstein's Theory of Relativity it says that [15mins 7secs] in black holes spacetime curvature becomes infinite and time stops altogether), and conversely time is faster away from all mass. It's not clear to me if the permeability and permittivity of free space might possibly be different outside of any gravitational field, and similarly we can't be sure if gravitational constant G and the Finestructure constant vary. Someone said that Relativity theory includes the possibility of wormholes, where travelling through space is much quicker. (Will Wormholes Allow Fast Interstellar Travel? PBS Space Time July 2020 youtube) If that's a real scientific possibility according to Relativity theory then time itself could also speed up the further away from any mass.
As an aside, if a constant speed of light/time is found not to apply, the further we go from any mass, then Relativity may need reviewing ? If that can be validated then the idea or philosophy that everything is relative - and nothing is absolute (including that statement) - may need reviewing too ? It's tricky, but as a heuristic/rule of thumb we know that God endowed purpose or function are reasonable guides for our "norms"; otherwise the rule of law becomes humanly arbitrary, and the survival of the strongest where the ends justify the means is all that exists - without a meaningful notion of conscience.
Atomic Clocks Are Reinventing Time Bloomberg Quicktake 20/2/21
http://youtu.be/hzLTgtFaPLY
How Atomic Clocks Work
Dom Burgess 2017
http://youtu.be /l8CI3bs9rvY
As an aside, we may need to explore any effect, of change in the atomic processes and speed of light well outside any gravity well/s, (and the Standard Model of physics), on the redshift of galaxies.
Frequency (f) and wavelength (lambda) are joined by the equation
, where c is the speed of light. As the speed of light is ?constant?, if you increase the frequency, the wavelength must decrease to maintain this equation and vice versa. This means that the relationship between frequency and wavelength is inversely proportional.
( www.omnicalculator.com /physics/wavelength )
Changes in c (ie speed of atomic processes used to measure c), due to changes in proximity to gravity wells, may impact the standard model and starlight in some previously unanticipated way.
In other words, it's ?potentially? possible that starlight's reduced frequency towards the red end of the spectrum (redshift) ?may? be associated with faster atomic/shorter time processes, and is ?less to do? with the speed at which galaxies are receding from us - or may be a compound effect ? It needs more investigation.
We're reminded that the hypothetical Big Bang claims that everything originated from and are constituted of quantum energy. (A Brief History Of Time. Stephen Hawking. p 136) "In
quantum theory, particles can be created out of energy in the form of particle / antiparticle pairs", ie matter and antimatter - per the standard model of quarks leptons and bosons.
Beyond the Higgs: What's Next for the LHC? [23 mins]
The Large Hadron Collider reduces all matter to quanta. And photons/light have recently been shown to have quantum entanglement, at least over a distance of
143kms. The
University of Vienna's experiment, published in PNAS, separated the particles even farther. Using a massive detector between the Canary Islands of La Palma and Tenerife, it separated the particles by 143 kilometres.
Quantum Entanglement: Spooky Action at a Distance
Inter-dimensional and material beings would rely on those dimensions or mechanisms of our Cosmos to rapidly move around - which mechanism would have existed before any creatures did, for the universe's/Cosmos's own existence & creation.
(Again, if you explain angels as having their origins through supernatural laws, "without having any regard for physics, reality, etc.", no longer is "naturalism" the only laws at work in the universe. A precedent is set which can apply for the origins of humanity and the universe.) And, if any faster-than-light phenomena exists that would become the benchmark for measuring the age of the universe/Cosmos, rather than the current light speed, (again, because belief in the frontiers of quantum physics, inter-dimensional near death experiences, our body/soul/spirit, the question of why don't identical twins have identical personalities, and angels set a precedent for belief that the multi-dimensional Cosmos was also created beyond our natural frontier of quantum materialism's laws.) Including for any "communications" alleged to be over light years distance, where question and reply
round-trip happen in real time, not 4+ years at a time - demons disguised as aliens.
Physicists explore Einsteins spooky quantum entanglement.
Research on quantum entanglement as it relates to gravity.
It is thought, "old" aliens could not exist in a universe dated by the existence of it's own rapid travel mechanism.
Panspermia must be out too. Any events seem likely to be low-life (abduction) fallen angels, reported to be masquerading as "old" grays.
Ancient material multiverse/s are similarly ruled out by inter-dimensional travel speed too.
Have you considered The Case For A Creator Ch 6 - youtube for the many scientifically determined factors required for life to exist on a rare, maybe
uniquely, habitable planet ? (or perhaps the
book may be of interest)
Also, from a Biblical reference point, the angels & Christ? that met with
Abraham on the way to Sodom had a meal with Abraham, they were part of that time+space (Genesis 18:2-8). Genesis 19:10 "But the men put forth their hand, and pulled Lot into the house to them, and shut to the door." They were part of that time+space to physically handle Lot - yet had come from heaven.
God And Stephen Hawking -
Whose Design Is It Anyway ? by Dr John Lennox. Heavy weights in philosophy
get down to the facts in cosmological views. A real eye opener, in lay person's
language.
Dr John Lennox's Superb Books
Dr John Lennox's Website
Pascal's Wager - There Is A God & After-Life
Click To Read This
Without biblically true Holy Spirit inspired spiritual 'discernment' and accompanying faith, one can not know for 'certain' that God, an afterlife, heaven or hell exist; we aim for being 'beyond reasonable doubt' (Christian Apologetics N Geisler pp 128, 293, 314, 315) (Tit 2:13 looking for the blessed hope). Evidences seen here and at other philosophical / apologetics websites give us confidence (have you considered Compelling Info.)
God gives enough proof to satisfy any reasonable person who is willing to
submit to the truth, but not enough to convince the proud skeptic who is bent on unbelief. Renowned Harvard law professor Simon Greenleaf observed:
"Christianity does not profess to convince the perverse and head-strong, to bring irresistible evidence to the daring and profane, to vanquish the proud scorner, and afford evidences from
which the careless and perverse cannot possibly escape. This might go to destroy man's responsibility. All that Christianity professes, is to propose such evidences as may satisfy the meek, the tractable, the candid, the
serious inquirer" (The Testimony of the Evangelists Examined by the Rules of Evidence).
(An Unshakeable Faith p 17)
For a more academic and philosophically sound study of what is Truth
have you considered the book Christian Apologetics
by N. Geisler.
Starlight, Time and the New Physics - an excellent read
or Kindle eBook Edition
Origins - Cosmic evidence For a Young World with Dr. Russell Humphreys
The Creation Answers Book - answers for many riddles
Beyond Opinion Challenges From Science - Google Books
- an excellent read for Dr John Lennox's in-depth analysis of Science's boundaries or limitations
Beyond Opinion: Living the Faith
We Defend (amazon.com)
2 videos for the technically inclined about genetics, cellular information, and simple statistical truths
programmingoflife.com
There are testimonies about raising people back to life who were dead for a notable amount of time, and remarkable healing's (those being less controversial than most are), which most likely could not have been done without the power of God through His Spirit (for those specific examples).
Have you considered the best video
Daniel Ekechukwu ?
Daniel Ekechukwu Reports
There is a little controversy in Christian circles about Daniel's description of the afterlife.
A thought provoking discussion can be found here about heaven and hell.
Daniel Ekechukwu claims personally
verified by leader.
The video appears to show a death certificate or mortuary notice from Dr Josse (3 mins 20-40 secs). He claims to have used a stethoscope and there were no sounds from Daniel's heart, his pupils were fixed and dilated. The mortician also confirms that Daniel was stiff and lifeless (4 mins 30-48 secs), and so he partially began the poisonous embalming procedure. Others thought he was a corpse too.
This isn't the same as
other near death experiences. It's doubtful that other religions have a comparable example, can someone cite one with details that are as good as this - or only lesser NDE's ?
What is the time limit for one's heart to be stopped, (3 days is mentioned ie Daniel died on 30 Nov 2001 and his corpse was taken to the church on 2 Dec 2001), but still stiff, with pupils fixed and dilated and body stiff and lifeless so as to partially begin embalming, before the damage of that overrides testing for a flatline with an EEG ? Clinical death - wikipedia. There must be a limit to how long the heart can be stopped before brain and maybe heart damage becomes significant.
Do you think if he'd spent a notable amount of time in the mortuary after being driven around the area, (with what a number of people believed to be a corpse), that Daniel would have suffered significant brain damage since his heart had stopped - as attested by the doctor and mortician, and he was stiff and lifeless so as to begin partial embalming ? Yet he revived, back to perfect health, despite previously having crashed into the steering wheel and windscreen at some speed, which later caused breathing difficulties serious enough to warn his wife of impending death.
An important goal of true wide spread spirituality is to resolve large scale entropy, and false spirituality can't do that on a large scale. False spirituality is based on sloppy scholarship or near enough is good enough. We humans often unsuspectingly trust and fall for "the grass being greener" in some new direction, but we then climb our ladder/s of success only to find - sometimes too late - it was leaning against the wrong wall. We need to be in touch with God who makes the grass grow, and green; and some measure of constructive critical Bible based thinking is our ally, like the noble Bereans who cross checked everything with scripture. Matt 4:4 Jesus answered, "It is written: 'Man does not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God.'", all else succumbing to entropy. The Bible teaches us to test the spirits of wannabe emperor/leaders to make sure - in time - that their advocacy and direction conforms with
suprema/sola scriptura (wikipedia) or
Suprema/Sola Scriptura Book - ie Bible proof texts and associated doctrines based on world wide scholarship from conservative orthodoxy only the Bible has inspired heptadic structure. Wide is the road of deception and many that follow it. Our spiritual guidance is of the utmost importance and not subject to political expediency or whims and financial considerations, like empire building that ignores God/Jesus. For a more complete treatment of our spiritual direction and convictions, have you considered Afterlife.html ? A key to understanding authentic saving faith is here.
To distinguish true spirituality from all counterfeits, or
look-alikes, have you considered False Supernatural ?
Occult spirituality can't repeatedly raise the dead like Jesus on demand miracles did and doesn't gain an afterlife for us.
There's no solution to "entropy" through some wannabe emperor/leaders. Christ can only subdue large scale entropy when invited to if we fulfill all His teachings - such as
found at sites linked to by god-help.org.
We have to beware of counterfeit Christ wannabes, (the anti/pseudo-Christs), who can't repeatedly raise the dead on demand -- one-off NDE's are interesting but not in the same league as Christ -- and have made or make fine sounding Christ-like pronouncements that don't have the equivalent
of the Bible's heptadic structure showing Holy Spirit inspiration.
If supernatural laws or scientifically impossible feats ?are in fact reality? then much that we know about the universe needs reviewing.
By supposed lack of evidence, one or two assume we know much that there is to know about science and the universe. There's no doubt more yet to be discovered. It's not like science has a theory of everything,
science really is still relatively recent on the timeline of human achievements.
As we all know, we live by the axiom that the truth, and the devil, is invariably
in the details, the bleeding edge of human knowledge and wisdom, for which critical
thinking and learning proves essential, as long as it doesn't contravene biblical
truths (have you considered Compelling
Info.) As is commonly said, a little knowledge (or even a good amount) can be
a dangerous thing. As far as the so called 'science' of origins is concerned, the
jury ever remains out on partial evidence, with profound mysteries, for which
sampling errors and successive approximation dominate.
Something that may clarify our thinking on the so called 'science' of origins is
to point to the claim that human knowledge increases exponentially over time
(for example try and read all the books and websites on offer). It's perhaps part
of the reason that God tells us we walk by faith more than by sight. It's virtually
impossible to know the majority of details in many subjects of science, no one can
be an all knowing mathematician / biologist / microbiologist / chemist / physicist /
nuclear physicist / astrophysicist / philosopher and all the fields of science. Humanity
never will know it all, there are many profound mysteries; though there are some, in
the so called 'science' of orgins that have been able to get away with faking it for
too long.
Where did all the information come from for DNA/RNA, what is
energy and Life, how does quantum physics apply to DNA, what constitutes intellect
/ mind / personality - as is purported to also be required of angels, and that of our own body / soul / spirit,
why don't identical twins have identical personalities - is it due to copy-number-variations
even from their earliest age and for every pair of twins on Earth, what are instincts intuition and
inspiration, what is imagination and choice, how do DNA and quantum physics give rise to thoughts and what is concentration, what is language and why does it differ so widely, how do angels employ these things, how does the brain work and how does quantum physics apply to the brain, quite a lot of profound mysteries that evolution glosses over.
Another question is, how on earth did God confuse the tongues at the tower of
Babel ? (eSword Genesis 11:9) There's a real mystery about human language that
humanity doesn't really comprehend yet. It has been suggested that there may be
a real connection (perhaps supernatural) between language and the things of God.
Ian McCormack Glimpse of Eternity - Stung/Poisoned A Number Of Times To Death Then Revived Later On
Evolution Just So Stories
Click To Read This
It would be surprising if mapping of all DNA to morphology
and variations would explain any more than adaptation, rather than morphological emergence through
transmutation or macro evolution. I don't know of anyone that doubts or denies adaptation. But given
the vastly complex supposedly inter-related morphologies of the
Phylogenetic_tree, it seems that induction or extrapolation from simple
adaptation to arrive at this vastly complex "tree" stretches credibility into the realms of
being poor science (science dereliction). It's tempting to over simplify it all by
reducing it to DNA mapping, as though grass is related to a donkey - and the above mentioned aspects
of people and life can be ignored or glossed over. Someone commented that there isn't a linear one-to-one
relationship between variations in DNA and morphology, and the matter apparently is subject to ongoing research
and notable controversy, probably for some time yet.
Have you considered Anthropology & Apemen Questions and Answers ?
The Case For A Creator excerpts on Youtube.
Can we recommend -
The Case For Christ, The Case For a Creator, The Case For Faith 3-DVD Collection
(They may require a multizone DVD player if not in the US, otherwise the books may be of interest)
The Case For Christ book,
The Case for a Creator book,
The Case for Faith book
Compelling Info . . .
The Kingdom Of The Occult by Dr Walter Martin
The authoritative reference. Occult spirituality can't repeatedly raise the dead like Jesus on demand miracles did, and doesn't gain an afterlife for us.
To distinguish true spirituality from all counterfeits, or look-alikes, have you considered False Supernatural ?
Chatting with Jesus - If A J Miller (or anyone else that wannabe emperor so called spiritual leaders) say they allegedly speak or have spoken as for
God / gods or Jesus (anti/pseudo-Christs) one might ask if this speech is supernaturally
inspired, as testified to by the modern day equivalent of Bible heptadic structure
and possibly? equidistant letter sequences (ELS - wikipedia) ?
For more on numerics & ELS, have you considered
The Seal of God and Cosmic Codes ? If there were gods then they would need to be infinite in order to be able to resolve entropy throughout our Cosmos. If they can't repeatedly raise the dead on demand then they're not gods, just creatures like the rest of humanity, with no possibility of giving us an afterlife. Claims like that are so called spiritual texts that don't have heptadic structure, eg the mormon and other human texts, and beings that don't have any evidence of divinity, namely heptadic's and repeatedly raising the dead, or other proofs of being infinite, not finite. Similarly, if so called ascended beings exist on Earth they would need to be infinite, to repeatedly raise the dead, etc like so called gods, otherwise they can't resolve large scale entropy, throughout the Cosmos, nor offer us an afterlife (fallen angels masquerading as other beings or so called aliens).
The Kingdom Of The Cults by Dr Walter Martin
The authoritative reference work on major cult systems for nearly forty years.
Mat 16:13 And coming into the parts of Caesarea Philippi,
Jesus asked His disciples, saying, Who do men say Me to be, the Son of Man?
Mat 16:14 And they said, Some say, John the Baptist; some, Elijah; and others, Jeremiah, or one of the prophets.
Mat 16:15 He said to them, But who do you say I am?
Mat 16:16 And Simon Peter answered and said, You are the Christ(Messiah), the Son of the living God.
The best deceptions often contain a lot of truth, interlaced subtly with error/s, as many scientists usually
know - including when the sampling errors and approximations of statistics are involved. It comes down to
whether we're going to trust / put our faith in God, or Fog - the all seeing eye's theories [full of holes
and many unanswered profound mysteries described above].
What must I do To Have The Afterlife ?
A key to understanding authentic saving faith is here.
Which churches do we recommend. A key starting point to the knowledge of God is the reality of the
supernatural - as far as Jesus is involved. Above discussion of the supernatural - as far as Jesus
is involved - are keys to that reality, overthrowing the naturalism or materialism worldview. We
recommend conservative churches and their home / cell groups.
For truth about the Apostle Peter consider ebook -
Petrus Romanus: The Final Pope Is Here
(Kindle Locations 3490-3640).
(A Briefer History Of Time. Stephen Hawking. p 117; A Brief History Of Time. Stephen Hawking. pp 131-136) "
... it would be very difficult to construct a complete unified theory of everything in the universe
all at one go. So instead we have made progress by finding
partial theories that describe a limited range of happenings and by neglecting other
effects or approximating them by certain numbers. The laws of science, as we know them at
present, contain many numbers -- for example the size of the electric charge of the
electron and the ratio of the masses of the proton and the electron-- that we cannot, at the
moment at least, predict from theory. Instead we have to find them by observation and then
insert them into equations. Some call these numbers fundamental constants; others
call them fudge factors
[As an aside, were a few of the fundamental constants/"fudge factors" measured near our planet and solar system so that those few aren't proven constants outside our solar system and galaxy ? If correct then a few of the dependent quantum?+physics theories will potentially be similarly in need of revising to only apply within our solar system or near Earth cf --
http://en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Physical_constant ].
(p132) The remarkable
fact is that the values of these numbers seem to have been very finely adjusted to make possible the development of life. ... One can take this either as evidence of a divine purpose in
Creation and the choice of the laws of science, or as support for the strong
anthropic principle. (See pp 132-133 for objections to the strong anthropic principle.) ... In quantum theory, particles
can be created out of energy in the form of particle / antiparticle pairs."
(The Theory of Everything. Stephen Hawking. p 165)
"We can ask about the nature of God even if there is only one possible unified theory that is
just a set of rules and equations. What is
it that breathes fire into the equations and makes a universe for them to describe ?
The usual approach of science of constructing a mathematical model cannot answer the question of why
there should be a universe for the model to describe. ... Is the unified theory so compelling
that it brings about it's own existence ?"
(A Brief History of Time. Stephen Hawking. pp 54-55) "So in the end our work became generally
accepted and nowadays nearly everyone assumes that the universe started with a big bang
singularity. It is perhaps ironic that, having changed my mind, I am now trying to
convince other physicists that there was in fact no singularity at the beginning of
the universe ... it can disappear once quantum effects are taken into account. ...
However, general relativity claims to be only a partial theory, so what the singularity
theorems really show is that there must have been a time in the very early universe, when
the universe was so small, that one could no longer ignore the small-scale effects of the
other great partial theory of the twentieth century, quantum mechanics. ... efforts to
combine the two partial theories into a single quantum theory of gravity."
Have you considered
Dismantling The Big Bang ?
Starlight, Time and the New Physics - an excellent read
or Kindle eBook Edition
Origins - Evidence For a Young World with Dr. Russell Humphreys
The Creation Answers Book - answers for many riddles
(Stephen Hawking's Universe. D Filkin. p 157)
"However well established the current evidence for the expanding evolving universe might
seem to be, it is well to remember that it is largely based on analyzing the light from
the proportion of the universe which we can actually see. And there is good reason to
believe that there is much more of the universe for us to still detect" (ie see discussion
of dark matter - without which the equations give only a rough model). "In fact what we can
actually see may turn out to be less than a tenth of all there is in the universe. Most
cosmologists believe that 90 percent of the essential nature of the universe has still
to be revealed. It is as if we have only so far looked at the tip of the (light) iceberg.
A question about the highly chaotic Big Bang model is, why
is the Earth alone fine tuned for life while other astronomical objects seem to often mostly be
hydrogen and helium or otherwise inhospitable to life
(see Big Bang Simon Singh p 284)
? For more on the incredible fine tuning of Earth, probably making it unique in the universe, have you
considered The Case For A Creator excerpts on Youtube.
News article :
"Don't forget that the Standard Model only explains four per cent of the Universe,"
Rolf Heuer, Director General of CERN, said at a press conference. "We have a long
way to go."
Scientists speculate that the other 96 per cent of the Universe consists of dark
matter (26 per cent) and dark energy (70 per cent), neither of which has been
directly observed.
(A Brief History Of Time. Stephen Hawking. p 136) "In quantum theory, particles
can be created out of energy in the form of particle / antiparticle pairs."
Hebrews 11:3 says that "By faith we understand that the universe was prepared by
the word of God, so that what is seen was made from things that are invisible. "
Christianity For Skeptics: An Understandable Examination of Christian Belief
- Does God exist ?
- If there is a God, why is there evil ?
- Is atheism rational ?
- Is the Bible the word of God ?
- What about other religions, including Islam and the New Age ?
Dating in Archaeology: Radiocarbon & Tree-Ring Dating
"The coal deposits are said by evolutionists to have formed over millions of years, but they
contain the fossils of perfectly-preserved skeletons, including two-ton dinosaurs, which would
have had to have been covered almost instantly. In 1878, miners working in the Mons coalfield
in Belgium discovered 39 iguanodon dinosaur skeletons, many of them complete, at a depth of
322 meters. They were 10 meters long and weighed two tons each. For their bodies to be rapidly
buried would require rates of deposition thousands or even millions of times greater than the
average 0.2 millimeters per year proposed by uniformitarians. (Milton, Shattering the Myths, p.
84)."
Have you considered DNA Similarity Myth
Human vs Chimp Y chromosome shock
Origin Of Species - Was Darwin Right ? Dr Terry Mortenson
The Bible And The Age Of The Earth
"Adam, the first man, was created in the sixth day, lived through the seventh day, and into
at least a portion of the eighth day. If these days were long geologic periods of millions
of years in length, we have the interesting situation of Adam having lived in a portion of
one age, through the whole of another age, and into at least a portion of a third age, in
which case he was many millions of years old when he finally died!"
What must I do To Have The Afterlife ?
A key to understanding authentic saving faith is here.
Cosmic Codes Evidence Of Design Bible numerics & heptadic structure
discussion.
(A critique of this topic indicates it to be a little controversial, in contrast
to above mentioned facts about there being more to life, and the numerics topic partially needs
a bit more work, but The Seal of God shows these patterns to be
found in nature too, not just a numerical reading of the Bible; besides those various
other codes mentioned in Cosmic Codes.)
One example --
Please note the following is not the controversial Equidistant Letter Sequences, read Cosmic Codes for more.
The following has all been met in the first 11 verses (in the Greek) in the genealogy of Jesus Christ in Matthew chapter 1. Also refer to the
works of
Ivan Panin (re wikipedia) on the heptadic structure of the Bible, distinguishing it from all other literature. (one example of evidences for supernatural
design in God's Word)
Excerpt ( With Permission Koinonia House )
A Design Challenge
Consider the following assignment. Try designing a genealogy, even
from fiction, which meets the following criteria:
1. The number of words in it must be divisible by seven evenly.
(In each of these constraints, it is assumed that the resulting
divisions are without any remainders.)
2. The number of letters must also be divisible by seven.
3. The number of vowels and the number of consonants must also
each be divisible by seven.
4. The number of words that begin with a vowel must be divisible
by seven.
5. The number of words that begin with a consonant must be divisible
by seven.
6. The number of words that occur more than once must be divisible
by seven.
7. The number of words that occur in more than one form shall be
divisible by seven.
8. The number of words that occur in only one form shall be divisible
by seven.
9. The number of nouns shall be divisible by seven.
10.Only seven words shall not be nouns.
11.The number of names in the genealogy shall be divisible be seven.
12.Only seven other kinds of nouns are permitted.
13.The number of male names shall be divisible by seven.
14.The number of generations shall be 21, also divided by seven.
If you encountered such a genealogy, would you attribute such
characteristics as these to random chance ?
These have all been met in the first 11 verses (in the Greek) in the genealogy of Jesus Christ in Matthew chapter 1. Also refer to
the works of
Ivan Panin (re wikipedia) on the heptadic structure of the Bible,
distinguishing it from all other literature, (one example of evidences for supernatural
design in God's Word).
A free Windows program (32/64 bit) to compute factors of Numerics (9 MegaBytes) numbers is offered here.
A free android factors.apk
Isa 59:19 When the enemy comes in like a flood, The Spirit of the LORD will lift up a standard against him.
False Supernatural
Have you considered that numerics is part of the story as we're not only concerned with
numerical values of greek or hebrew letters and words, but with counting letters, words, vocabulary,
vowels, consonants, nouns, etc. This second aspect of heptadic structure needs to be in
many cases independent of the language in which it is written, and if a Text or statement
is said to be spiritual and authoritative (inspired from God / gods or Jesus) in it's
original language or inspired translation then it should have this secondary aspect of
unique heptadic structure irrespective of the original language. Counting letters, words,
vocabulary, vowels, consonants, nouns, etc can equally be applied to any language, including
english, latin, arabic, etc. Therefore, testing for this secondary aspect of heptadic
structure can be applied to any Text or communique claimed to be of 'spiritual' authority,
ie speaking for God / gods or Jesus. Again, if there were gods then they would need to be
infinite in order to be able to resolve entropy throughout our Cosmos. If they can't repeatedly
raise the dead on demand then they're not gods, just creatures like the rest of humanity, with
no possibility of giving us an afterlife. Claims like that are so called spiritual texts that
don't have heptadic structure, eg the mormon and other human texts, and beings that don't have
any evidence of divinity, namely heptadic's and repeatedly raising the dead, or other proofs
of being infinite, not finite.
There's no solution to 'entropy' through some wannabe emperor/leaders.
Christ can only subdue entropy when invited to if we fulfill all His teachings - such as found at sites linked to by god-help.org.
I wonder if the rock that is / was cut out without human hands is foremost Christ, as the chief cornerstone, then the conservative body of Christ built up by God's Holy Spirit into the Temple of the Holy Spirit in which God the Father and Son dwell.
This Body is differentiated from other philosophical and so called spiritual wannabes
by Bible heptadic structure eg above (and possibly? ELS) - which was 'discovered' within
the Bible - God's Word - recalling that Jesus the Rock is also the Word incarnate.
1Co 10:4 "and drank the same spiritual drink; for they drank from the spiritual rock
that accompanied them, and that rock was Christ."
I suspect this heptadic testimony would be impossible to upstage, in any other form of
the Rock.
Epigenetics: Big New Changes in Genetics Click To Read This
...
Things haven't turned out that way. Advances in technology and ideas in the 1990s allowed
researchers to more easily study the linkage between what we see in the DNA (the genotype)
and what we get in the cell or the creature (the phenotype). They confirmed the growing
suspicions that this linkage is not a one-to-one relationship: what you see in the DNA is
not fully what you get in the creature. ...
Above URL links to the full article.
Chatting with Jesus - If A J Miller (or anyone else that wannabe emperor so called spiritual leaders) say they allegedly speak or have spoken as for
God or Jesus (anti/pseudo-Christs) one might ask if this speech is supernaturally
inspired, as testified to by the modern day equivalent of Bible heptadic structure
and possibly? equidistant letter sequences (ELS - wikipedia) ?
For more on numerics & ELS, have you considered
The Seal of God and Cosmic Codes ?
The Global Consequences Of Americas Drought
Are you acquainted with UN Agenda 21/30 on population control or management,
that no doubt is a best effort by governments, but omits God's remedying of the Earth's water cycle
(once widely accepted as our leader) so deserts blossom once again, freeing up land for food, energy
production, and population growth.
Graphene water filters will assist water filtering, but will still need to deal with the enormous byproduct of salt, and the enormous land coverage required for the Sahara, Australian, and other deserts.
The saharaforestproject.com will make partial in-roads into restoring our deserts, but filtering sea water through corrugated cardboard or graphene filters requires replacing or cleaning out those filters regularly, over an enormous area, so doesn't scale up well into a large scale reclamation of our deserts.
Have you considered Transhumanism & the Supernatural - Humans Genetically Blended With Animals ?
By sequencing the genome of mutants we can demonstrate DNA that differs from the sequenced human genome, so can be proven to be synthesized rather than natural. And the case against evolution still stands, with it offering no afterlife, or solution to large scale entropy, as it is still finite not infinite. Only an infinite God/Jesus can resolve large scale entropy throughout our Cosmos and biosphere.
If evolution over millions of years were a fact of life, it ought to have given us a utopia by now, and it hasn't. And the human population ought to be enormous; with little left of soil minerals; and our alleged ancestors ought to have produced modern science and technology.
Have you considered these discussion points ?
Curious iron artifact found in stone
5 strange underwater mysteries we still can't explain
9 Mysterious Things Found Underwater Nobody Can Explain
Where are all the human fossils? Forbidden archaeology, by Cremo and Thompson,
lists some out-of-place human artefacts. Cremo's youtube video displays these ancient artefacts
dating hundreds of thousands to millions of years old (by conventional thinking).
Young Age Discussion Points
If humans had been on the Earth for long ages then wouldn't Earth's population be enormous ?
Wouldn't salt content in the oceans be considerably higher ? What about land erosion ?
Wouldn't the mineral content of Earth's soil be entirely depleted ?
The probable answer is that because we don't have an enormous population, ancients didn't achieve our modern science or technology, and soil minerals aren't depleted yet that some things don't add up. How did grass become a donkey, since all DNA is supposedly just mutants of preceding DNA ? Forgetting about issues to do with how quantum physics applies to DNA.
http://en.wikipedia.org /wiki /Dinosaur "the first dinosaur fossils were recognized in the early 19th century" ie about 1820-1840. The Megalosaurus is said to have been one of the first dinosaurs discovered, in England in 1676AD.
http://en.wikipedia.org /wiki /Megalosaurus
Part of a bone was recovered from the Taynton Limestone Formation of Stonesfield limestone quarry, Oxfordshire in 1676. Sir Thomas Pennyson gave the fragment to Robert Plot, Professor of Chemistry at the University of Oxford and first curator of the Ashmolean Museum, who published a description and illustration in his Natural History of Oxfordshire in 1676. It was the first illustration of a dinosaur bone published. The bone has since been lost, but the illustration is detailed enough that some have since identified it as that of Megalosaurus.
Most AMAZING Fossil Discoveries Ever! Origins Explained 2019 youtube
The 1878 find of iguanodon fossils, in Belgium, 1000 feet below ground level is also mentioned.
More on the Paluxy tracks.
The Acambaro dinosaur figurines
The Acambaro figurine controversy in detail.
The discoverer of the figurines didn't find them until 1944, in the mid twentieth century, so their creation had to be much earlier than 1944, and 1939 isn't early enough to compact the mud.
http://en.wikipedia.org /wiki /Ac%C3%A1mbaro figures
"Based on the degree of signal regeneration found in remeasured samples, they estimated that the figurines tested had been fired approximately 30 years prior to 1969." So an estimated date of firing and creation would then be 1939, approximately. But the mud in which they were found required digging up with shovels, so was compacted, which then indicates that much time had past since creation of the figurines and their burial more than the approximately 5 years proposed by wikipedia.
The reliable standard for dating ancient artefacts is not as immutable as it seems. Using hydroxy gas, the result of simple water electrolysis, radioactivity is naturally neutralized. There may have been a similar or related natural process in Earth's ancient volcanic creation or volcanism caused floods/tsunamis that diminished isotopes, converting them to daughter elements ? It needs more investigation.
Again, we don't know how substantially faster atomic processes were before substantial time dilation could occur, at the beginning of time when planets and stars were either tiny or only water ("the deep") and gases (hydrogen or helium?). It's likely that rapid atomic processes included isotopes. So the formation of stellar bodies from small to large very likely caused both normal matter and isotopes to rapidly age, and strata may have been partly rapidly affected too. Then those processes would have slowed down, both for normal matter and isotopes, as stellar bodies rapidly grew in size, with associated increase in time dilation due to gravity wells.
The Azores, in the Atlantic near to Portugal, evidence flooded previously inhabited lands.
100k Yr Old Pyramid Submerged In Azores, Mystery History II
http://youtu.be /rtWUGpIGU3I
The people who constructed the sunken pyramid in the Azores are clearly of the same alleged era as the pyramid, atleast 100,000 years old - by conventional thinking, so that means anatomically modern humans coexisted with Neanderthals, who also are associated with that alleged era. Therefore, the so called paleolithic stoneage era included both the pockets of Neanderthals (found throughout the world) and the anatomically modern Azore humans, who had incredible stone cutting and pyramid building skills.
It's therefore likely that the woolly mammoth pits found in Mesoamerica are likely associated with anatomically modern humans too.
What hasn't been lost to history, such as cities or nations with lost past, and nothing of artefacts to support it, are fragmentary remains of widespread pockets of humanity. As is sometimes stated, the absence of evidence isn't necessarily evidence of absence. It can be nonexistent, but often modern cities or nations can be built from fallen past ones. An example of this is the history of Jerusalem, and Tels/mounds in the middle east. Prevailing paradigms are sustained by security through obscurity.
The same applies to the Denisovan humans, also associated with the alleged paleolithic era - by conventional thinking.
2 Million Year-Old Bridge In India - by conventional thinking.
Again, there may have been a natural hydroxy gas process, in volcanism caused floods/tsunamis that diminished isotopes, converting them to daughter elements ? It needs more investigation. If humans have been on Earth for long ages then we ought to have a considerably larger population. They ought to have achieved modern science and technology.
http://befreetech.com /techpage.htm
"To their end (and ours potentially) the government is taking radioactive materials and burying them in the ground, thus exposing us to the greatest threat in our history!
But - there's a technology we are offering now called R-Gas that can neutralize radio-active waste!
A proof was shown during the 2001 Technology Tour Show, that radioactive isotopes can be made completely stable and neutral!
R-Gas machines are available now to cut steel, however they can also be used to neutralize radioactive waste! UCSA offered to neutralize all of the radio active waste with R-Gas for one tenth of a percent of the Trillions of tax dollars it cost to bury it in the northwest, but it shouldn't surprise you that no government interest could be raised.
Yes - the nucleus of an atom can be trans-mutated!
New York Congressman - the Honorable Dan Haley addressed an audience relating the details of a demonstration which Professor Yul Brown did for US Congressman Berkley Bedell of California.
Yul Brown took a piece of cobalt 60 and after one pass with R-Gas the sample was more than 90% neutralized.
The Geiger counter gave the radioactive level of the sample as 1,000 just before the procedure and instantly went to a reading of only 40 after he "cooked" the sample.
The U.S. Congressman, after witnessing the demonstration, called the Department of Energy and they sent five scientists down to witness the same demonstration with the same results. Subsequently government officials buried all records of this demonstration and have done all they could to forget that it happened."
Tree ring dating controversy, not so simple ?
If finite beings had a formula for a utopia, it would have occurred long ago. Because humans and angels are finite, we don't have the capacity for resolving the large scale entropy/issues that large populations and sophisticated/scientific
technologies cause. No matter the size of an organization, the answers to a smoothly functioning bio/ecosphere is an infinite God/Jesus.
Entropy
For finite beings to claim their organization holds the answers is not borne out by history, since no utopia has resulted. We're called to make "the way, the truth, the life" known to humanity, rather than a pseudo-Christ system that purports to resolve our most pressing questions. When we run low on natural resources, when populations get large, when national debts become hopeless, when various species go toward extinction, with dead zones in the sea, and evironmental concerns like pollution, with floods and droughts, when sufficient food production is inadequate for all nations including those with famine conditions, when the variety of premature death rates across all nations don't bear publicizing, our problems outstrip human capacities to resolve them - for our biosphere (humanly intractable).
We're allowed to give it our best efforts, such as sustainable development attempts, as long as we don't compromise on false teachings, but also recognize that finite beings can never resolve large scale problems. We can't even stop numerous medical conditions,
that medical science has catalogued, and superbugs are already on the horizon.
Some currently are flogging the alien UAP/UFO wishful thinking hoping their rescuers will soon show up. Even NASA are searching for signs of life out there.
I'm wary of folks that believe human organisations can solve the condition of our/humanity's hearts. Trying to achieve a utopia, without revival, thus far doesn't even recognise large scale entropy, and the need to follow course/s charted by God if we're ever to attain that utopia, life to the full, biblically indicated, as the way, the truth, the life.
Courses not charted by God eventually succumb to various forms of entropy, and finally death, both of people, with relatively short lifespans, and our biosphere. During the millennium, and further or later too, we're taught that believers will live much longer lives Isaiah 65:20 "No more shall an infant from there live but a few days, Nor an old man who has not fulfilled his days; For the child shall die one hundred years old,".
We can pursue our frankenstein ways but unless we're connected with God's Holy Spirit, in biblically consistent ways, then life itself and a utopia elude us. As DNA etc is constituted of invisible quantum physics/energy, so too efforts at frankenstein ways are unfulfillable promise/s (like trying to build a high technology "tower of babel"). Technologists may discover how to prolong life, but doing that without medical disease is elusive and we probably wouldn't have necessary quality of life.
The role of believers is to point us all to Christ's biblical Words of life, like one infinite solution for life's simultaneous equation; have you considered No Other God discussion of the Trinity ? John 17:21 "that they all may be one, as You, Father, are in Me, and I in You; that they also may be one in Us, that the world may believe that You sent Me." 1 Corinthians 8:6 "yet for us there is one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we for Him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, through whom are all things, and through whom we live."
God/Jesus alone are the infinite lifeforce and person that have the capacity for such demands, and repeatedly raised the dead on demand (unlike NDE's) and healed diseases. Heb 1:3 "who being the brightness of His glory and the express image of His person, and upholding all things by the word of His power, ..."
As highlighted by the heptadic structure of God's Word.
When God makes it possible to explore the renewed heavens, then human capacities will need an infinite God to run things even more.
Competing spiritual realities don't have a show of resolving these reality checks, being
finite. We all need to face up to these reality checks, since others can't repeatedly raise the dead on demand, or resolve our most pressing large scale needs. Wannabe pseudo messiahs need to repeatedly raise the dead on demand, resolve our national debts for all nations, resolve numerous medical conditions science has catalogued, perhaps create a solar-system in it's spare time, etc.
Utopia History
Imagine there's no leaven
It's easy not to cry
No smell to choke us
In love we really try
Imagine all the faithful
living on our pay... Aha-ah...
Imagine there're boundries
It isn't hard to do
Nothing to tell a lie for
And God's religion too
Imagine all the people
knowing Christ of peace... You...
You may say I'm a believer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And all the world will know I AM.
Imagine Love's possessions
I wonder if you can
No need to starve the hungry
Brotherhood of Son of Man
Imagine all the people
caring for the world... You...
You may say I'm a believer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And all the world will know I AM.
Copyright © 2018 god-help.org All Rights Reserved
Variety is a fact of life, it seems unlikely for christianity to be homogenous.
Imagine the Musical
(Imagine SD)
I've been alone with Christ inside my mind
And in my dreams, I've missed your bliss a thousand times
I sometimes see you knock upon my door
Hello, is it us you're looking for?
I can see it in your eyes
I can see it in your smile
You're all I've ever wanted
And your arms are open wide
'Cause you know just what to say
And you know just what to do
And I want to tell you so much...
I love you
I long to see the sunlight in your hair
And tell you time and time again how much I care
Sometimes I feel my heart will overflow
Hello, I've just got to let you know
'Cause I wonder where you are
And I wonder what you do
Are you somewhere feeling happy?
And is someone loving you?
Tell me how to win your heart
For I haven't got a clue
But let me start by saying...
I love you
Adapted From: Lionel Richie
Original lyrics © Brockman Music
Adaptation © 2021 god-help.org
God Defend New Zealand
God of Nations at thy feet, In the bonds of love we meet, hear our voices we entreat, God defend our free land.
Touring New Zealand
Ebooks
The Seal Of God Text eBook , PDF eBook
Designs in Nature : "Would you say that these millions of exquisite designs, far exceeding
in beauty and workmanship anything produced by man, are the result of mere chance ?"
It needs to be mentioned that with so much emphasis on biblical theology or theory that we can overlook God's mercy.
I don't adjudicate on issues that may or not fall into this category but prayerfully defer to God & Jesus.
The Great Gospel Deception by D. Servant
Apparently God requiring humanity to work for a living, while seeking first the kingdom of God and His righteousness and "all these things will be added unto you/us", is resolved with some type of asceticism / austerity DS describes. He later explains it, Jesus concluded: "So therefore, no one of you can be My disciple who does not give up all his own possessions" Luke 14:33 . "In order to be Jesus' disciple, we must relinquish ownership of all our possessions to His control. We become stewards of what is now His, and our material wealth will be used for His purposes. Otherwise we are not His disciples." Kindle Loc 1163. This isn't communism though, as it isn't State control, but a transformed view of how we conduct our affairs in light of Jesus' teaching. Again, we become faithful stewards, holding those things lightly until God requires them of us, and not indulging in the practice of self serving purchases that don't predominantly build God's influence.
To improve on the somewhat adhoc nature of stewardship we might adopt the Levite modus operandi for property ownership, primarily using church Trust/s to manage lease housing, and expensive items of property, for those fulfilling the great commission - similar to real estate companies that manage rental properties, purchased as a rent/lease to own - but eventually owned by the Trust/s. With 3D printed housing it's no longer prohibitive to build new houses at a budget price -
http://youtu.be /wCzS2FZoB-1
http://iconbuild.com
Copyright © 2003-2024
god-help.org
All Rights Reserved.
Home/Cell Groups are a good alternative for those who prefer it.